Comments on: Public Prosecutor v N: facts

By: Ten years ago, today « No To Rape

Ten years ago, today « No To Rape — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:19:07 +0000

[...] today, then Chief Justice Yong Pung How handed down the appeal judgment in the case of PP v N. (Summary of facts by court.) A woman was gagged, tied up, and forced to have sex – but despite clearcut evidence of [...]

By: Natasha Latiff

Natasha Latiff — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:58:13 +0000

THIS JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED JUST ONLY 10 YEARS AGO. Appalling.Are we aware of how recent this all is?

By: Rolling onward « No To Rape

Rolling onward « No To Rape — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:58:24 +0000

[...] is the 10th anniversary of the hearing of Public Prosecutor v N, the landmark case where a man gagged, tied up and forced sex upon his wife but could not be charged for rape – to the surprise, according to [...]

By: More on PP v N « No To Rape

More on PP v N « No To Rape — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:57:07 +0000

[...] it emerges that he was the prosecutor in the landmark marital rape case of PP v N. We previously posted the facts of this case, taken from the court [...]

By: Sex is mutual. Rape is violence. « No To Rape

Sex is mutual. Rape is violence. « No To Rape — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:57:09 +0000

[...] The No To Rape petition has nothing to do with situations where married adults have mutually consensual sex to show affection for each other, to conceive children, or for any other purpose. It is concerned only with how we respond in cases where a woman has not consented to sex, and her husband penetrates her against her wishes – cases like PP v N. [...]

By: What is at stake « No To Rape

What is at stake « No To Rape — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:04:40 +0000

[...] FAQ « Public Prosecutor v N: facts [...]